Reviews & Comments of Kingsquare HTML Validator chrome extension
From August 27th, 2012 to February 28th, 2019, 31% user give 4-star rating, 31% user give 3-star rating, 15% user give 2-star rating, 23% user give 1-star rating. for Kingsquare HTML Validator chrome extension.
Reviews of kingsquare html validator:
Might like it if I could get it to do something. Does not seem to check anything.
too finicky Should just show errors
Good plugin, but the output format is **horrible**...
Tried this on a site that passed the W3C validator and got spurious warnings (e.g. no DOCTYPE even though DOCTYPE existed, warnings about leftmargin on <body> when there was no such atribute). Also does not work on AJAX sites as far as I could see. Final nail is that if developer tools were not already open, requires a reload to validate.
The information produced is not useful...
Horrible errors/warning.
pro: incorporated into dev tools, thats great! con: just outputs text, it would be really nice if it linked back to the elements tab or something.
Great plugin! a bit more info around warnings and errors (some context maybe..) would be nice though..
Not a terrible plugin, but it can't handle UTF-8 encoded characters on UTF-8 encoded pages. It spits out warnings for each and every character, which rapidly gets tiresome.
I gave it 4 as it works offline which I've been looking for for a while. Gives the validation by line number, would be more helpful if you could highlight the element. If the code is on github I don't mind having a look at implementing this?
Error messages are useless
Would probably love it if I could get it to work...
Have long awaited this since moving from firefox to chrome for development... Nice to see this implemented in such a 'clean' and non obtrusive way!