Reviews & Comments of Fedora User Agent chrome extension

From August 3rd, 2015 to May 4th, 2022, 34% user give 5-star rating, 6% user give 4-star rating, 5% user give 3-star rating, 8% user give 2-star rating, 48% user give 1-star rating. for Fedora User Agent chrome extension.

Reviews of fedora user agent:


Harry Kruger May 4th, 2022
Harry Kruger

It breaks cloudflare, when I solve the captcha, it just asks me to do it again, and again... disabling this, fixed it.


Πίτσα April 19th, 2022
Πίτσα

The extension would be fine if it wasn't for the fact that it makes impossible to access sites with cloudfare protection.


Nicholas M March 23rd, 2021
Nicholas M

Eh it pops up on the side, so you gotta be blind to not notice it. Im new to Fedora so its whatever and it makes sense.


Eric Lopez January 18th, 2020
Eric Lopez

i like this extension and don't know what the big deal is. It just lets the world know this is Fedora!


Tyler Bialoblocki December 4th, 2019
Tyler Bialoblocki

I see nothing wrong with Fedora being included in the user agent string, as it provides useful metrics. As much as it would be nice if it notified users of installation, it's easy enough to uninstall if you have privacy concerns.


A Google User March 19th, 2019
A Google User

Why is this installed by default? All it does is provide a way of easily fingerprinting your browser and makes it considerably easier to track. don't forget to run this, or it'll come back: dnf remove fedora-user-agent-chrome.noarch


A Google User March 24th, 2019
A Google User

They should have alerted me to it before installing but it makes sense to let websites what OS you are using to make the web app behave better knowing in advance my system parameters but I still think they should alert you to it instead of me just stumbling on it!


Matthew Adamson February 23rd, 2019
Matthew Adamson

This should not auto-install!


Johan H. January 29th, 2019
Johan H.

Statistics are important. Making the argument that this automatic install is "breach of consent" is simply idiotic. This is built in the operating system and chrome just finds it as an extension upon install. Fedora, or google, should not have to ask for a proper "change" in the user agent as they don't have to do so otherwise but in the TOS upon install. It may look scary when it shows up as an extension, but all it is is just compensating for the browser not fully developed for Fedora.


風呂(Ray) January 23rd, 2019
風呂(Ray)

Fed users are a peculiar bunch. They get 30000 random apps and hundreds of demons installed with the operating system, but complain when the icon of one of them shows up anywhere on screen. Have you seen what Ubuntu, MacOS and Windows are doing for comparison, ads everywhere, Unkillable apps that popup randomly everywhere.


DropLord Geezy December 13th, 2018
DropLord Geezy

If I cared about things being installed on my browser without my consent I wouldn't be using chrome. It's honestly not that serious lol


Yuriy Kazmirchuk December 8th, 2018
Yuriy Kazmirchuk

Fedora Linux is great!


A Google User November 20th, 2018
A Google User

Let the world know from "where" we are! More Fedora accesses, so (theoretically) more .rpm/support for our lovely distro! :D


Steven H November 18th, 2018
Steven H

I have no problem advertising Fedora Linux. As to the auto installation; all browsers, apps, software do this via either code, extensions, add-ons and/or rule-sets/permissions. At least you see it listed and know that you can remove it if you wish.


Johan Cos October 22nd, 2018
Johan Cos

I'm too busy to give 1 star ratings to the other 10k packages Fedora installed without explicitly asking me first, so I"m not going to for this one either :-P


Hanro50 August 20th, 2018
Hanro50

It just tells sites you're using Fedora. Honestly chrome should have the service this provides built in like say firefox, but it doesn't. On the one hand you get the fear that advertising the obscure OS you're using is somehow dangerous. On the other hand telling random websites you're using said obscure OS might help them consider porting software to said obscure OS. Its a free OS, other distributions do far worse in terms of what the consider as "free" Also, don't forget Windows 10 pushes way worse junk then just a simplistic browser extension onto your OS


Tarush Khanna July 24th, 2018
Tarush Khanna

I don't like that it did not ask me before it installed this extension.


RJ Kent July 13th, 2018
RJ Kent

Find it acceptable to be automatically installed. Not diminishing my privacy that much.A useful metric to give out.


Keefer Rourke July 7th, 2018
Keefer Rourke

I don't object to the reasoning for the existence of this extension, but I *do* however object to the hidden installation of it. I should be alerted when this extension is enabled, and allowed to opt-in/out as I please. This is a breach of user trust, no matter how benign.


Tim Moor February 7th, 2018
Tim Moor

Haters gonna hate, I'm happy to represent.


fnp November 12th, 2017
fnp

If i can help fedora by installing this extension in my google-chrome, i would surely do that, because i like fedora very much! I don't like that it did not ask me before it installed this extension. To express my dislike of this fact, i rate this extension, even though the extension itself is not to blame for anything. Besides this, as i use google-chrome auto-sync for extensions across all machines, this extension will even be installed on my windows machines and might thus report wrong usage data anyway.


Aaron Aronoff October 24th, 2017
Aaron Aronoff

I am proud to be part of the FedoraProject.org, so even that mostly the logs of my visit wherever are statistically anonymous, I am glad to differ Fedora, as a popular Linux(R) OS... For example, Chrome OS by default mark itself, as CrOS - and without special extension :) Wondows and Mac too. Why Fedora should be messed with those Ubuntus and Linux Mint-kind of Distros?...


Raymond Wu Won October 22nd, 2017
Raymond Wu Won

This auto-enabled extension breaks access to Google Plus. Additionally, what does this mean for privacy re: browser fingerprinting? There's practically no benefit to it.


John Smith October 16th, 2017
John Smith

At this writing, the year is 2017. There is NO excuse for automatically installing anything; even functionally insignificant things; without the user's consent. Whatever happened to "Don't be evil."?


Cliphord Rich October 4th, 2017
Cliphord Rich

I still Love Chrome, Fedora Google and Debian. I Have never had a better set of teachers, guides and a friend when there was none. And so I am thankful this happened because it brought some new fun agents for me to play with!!!!


Steven Wang September 12th, 2017
Steven Wang

The linux install experience was perfect... first time in years feeling linux will stay on this laptop.. until this.. lol. A little more transparency with the installation would be appreciated. not really a showstopper vs how clean the rest of the installation is.


Paul Marc September 12th, 2017
Paul Marc

Yes it installs automatically, but it does its job adequately! Pros: - Works as intended Cons: - Installs automatically


William Perron August 1st, 2017
William Perron

DONT INSTALL IT WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE USER !!! The extensions in general is a nice idea.


Lucas Gillingham July 13th, 2017
Lucas Gillingham

I also sincerely disagree with the automatic installation. You should be prompted and asked, instead of throwing it into the browser at terminal velocity upon install, and not actively advertising what it does.


Zlatko Đurić April 10th, 2017
Zlatko Đurić

I don't like that this extension is installed without first asking. There's a controversy around it so read more about it online; my standpoint is that I don't want it automatically.


Anthony DiMichele March 27th, 2017
Anthony DiMichele

Installed without any consent from the user is a big no no. If you had asked and given a valid reason then I probably would have installed it.


Darren Nightshade February 15th, 2017
Darren Nightshade

Dont like the fact that it auto installed itself. Doesn't seem to add any benefit to the user.


Steven “S.J.” Gagne February 2nd, 2017
Steven “S.J.” Gagne

Along with so many others, I'd be more than happy to 'willingly' advertise Fedora as my Distro of choice. But please ask or you are stepping on two of the greatest benefits of Linux: Privacy and Choice.


Miłosz Gaczkowski February 2nd, 2017
Miłosz Gaczkowski

A functionally insignificant extension with a thoroughly unacceptable distribution policy. Wouldn't warrant much of a reaction if not for the auto install.


Rudolf Olah December 16th, 2016
Rudolf Olah

excellent


Da Foot December 2nd, 2016
Da Foot

Really like the idea of getting the Fedora name into stats/logs around the web, not so keen on auto install. Perhaps there could be a welcome page for the browsers that suggests adding the extension and reasons why?


Pushkaraj Thorat November 20th, 2016
Pushkaraj Thorat

..same as bunch of other guys saying. For it got installed without asking.


A Google User October 24th, 2016
A Google User

Installed without permission. An OS exists to let me run software, it is not meant to modify the software that I choose to install.


Daniel Combs October 2nd, 2016
Daniel Combs

NO consent for Chrome extension. Come on...I use the same google ID for work and multiple personal machines. Don't they all have to download the Fedora extension when I fire it up?


Grzegorz Wilk September 26th, 2016
Grzegorz Wilk

Extension _per se_ is ok - Chrome should allow distro advertising in user-agent. Just ask before installing anything in my browser (which btw *should* prevent such possible malware attack vectors!) This is just UNACCEPTABLE to a one-star degree!


Charlie Murff September 2nd, 2016
Charlie Murff

This is installed without consent or any notification to me. Terrible, terrible policy.


abhishekh sivakumar July 22nd, 2016
abhishekh sivakumar

Fedora is a *solid*, beautiful, and functional distro, and this is coming from an arch user.


A Google User July 9th, 2016
A Google User

I know you need to keep some system information on users. That's absolutely not a problem. Just ask first and make me aware of what is going on. That's not a lot to ask.


J S July 3rd, 2016
J S

fedora


David Tao June 16th, 2016
David Tao

It's doing nothing wrong. Remove if you don't want it, keep it if you don't mind it.


Joost VanDorp (vandorjw) June 8th, 2016
Joost VanDorp (vandorjw)

Installed without consent or a notification.


Scott Tsai May 14th, 2016
Scott Tsai

Linux distros need a way to market themselves and use the visitor statistics of 3rd party sites to judge their market share. I have no problem with Fedora auto-installing this extension.


Nick March 28th, 2016
Nick

Yes, it is true that this extension is by default installed without the consent of the user. However, you should also be noted that this being the Chrome version from within the DNF repositories, the people over at Fedora are the ones responsible for the content in their release of Chrome. Not to mention, it's removable. Its effect on your browser experience, whether or not you agreed on installing it, is negligible and the data collected by this extension will only be used by the people over at Fedora for counting purposes. It does NOT collect personal data and does NOT compromise your details in any way, shape or form any other empty extension does.


Jose Gonzalez March 28th, 2016
Jose Gonzalez

Best chrome extension ever! Am I Fedora fan boy? you bet! I find it hard to believe this would install automatically in any other distro. I would like to know though how was this achieved and who done it?! I doubt it was Google for the RPM is labeled Fedora/openSUSE If Fedora, I guess this falls under distro branding. If possible, do this to all browsers! I like to use Firefox for some websites...


books March 18th, 2016
books

install without consent is very bad!!!


Thomas O'Hara March 6th, 2016
Thomas O'Hara

Never asked for it, don't want it!


A Google User March 5th, 2016
A Google User

Installed without consent.


William Orosz March 5th, 2016
William Orosz

Installed without consent.


Flavio Garcia March 4th, 2016
Flavio Garcia

Why this extension is installed on my machine?


Jacob Lindahl March 2nd, 2016
Jacob Lindahl

Don't know why so many people have a problem with being honest.


Mikel Pérez March 2nd, 2016
Mikel Pérez

it doesn't work anymore. my UA is (X11; Linux x86_64) also, I disagree with the rest of the reviews on this being installed automatically, it is really of no harm and it's important for your UA to correctly identify your OS. if it were dangerous, it would need permissions which chrome would ask the problem seems to be in L25 of background.js it says detail instead of details


João Pina March 2nd, 2016
João Pina

I did asked for this extension


Ian Bertolacci March 1st, 2016
Ian Bertolacci

Touchin' my machine like this, who do you think you are?


A Google User November 16th, 2015
A Google User

I did not install this extension by my own accord, nor do I want it.


Mac B. November 6th, 2015
Mac B.

Not sure what's going on, but this extension appears to really be messing with my django development server. (requests stuck on pending). Since I didn't even know I had the extension (no opt in) it took me forever to figure out.


Shuxin Cheng October 20th, 2015
Shuxin Cheng

I did not installed this


Jason September 10th, 2015
Jason

I didn't install this extension, do not like having random extensions installed without me knowing.


Private Account August 12th, 2015
Private Account

I did not install this extension. Although I like to support Fedora, this code should be included in the Chrome browser, and not in an involuntarily installed third party extension.


Ernesto Alejo August 7th, 2015
Ernesto Alejo

I did not installed this


Andrew Wippler August 3rd, 2015
Andrew Wippler

I love showing my support for fedora!